Construct Non-Hierarchical P/NBD Model for Online Retail Transaction Data

In this workbook we construct our first hierarchical P/NBD models on the synthetic data with the longer timeframe.

1 Load and Construct Datasets

We start by modelling the P/NBD model using our synthetic datasets before we try to model real-life data.

1.1 Load Online Retail Data

We now want to load the online retail transaction data.

Code

customer_cohortdata_tbl <- read_rds("data/onlineretail_cohort_tbl.rds")
customer_cohortdata_tbl |> glimpse()

Rows: 5,852
Columns: 5
$ customer_id     <chr> "12346", "12347", "12348", "12349", "12350", "12351", …
$ cohort_qtr      <chr> "2010 Q1", "2010 Q4", "2010 Q3", "2010 Q2", "2011 Q1",…
$ cohort_ym       <chr> "2010 03", "2010 10", "2010 09", "2010 04", "2011 02",…
$ first_tnx_date  <date> 2010-03-02, 2010-10-31, 2010-09-27, 2010-04-29, 2011-…
$ total_tnx_count <int> 3, 8, 5, 3, 1, 1, 9, 2, 1, 2, 6, 2, 5, 10, 6, 4, 10, 2…

Code

customer_transactions_tbl <- read_rds("data/onlineretail_transactions_tbl.rds")
customer_transactions_tbl |> glimpse()

Rows: 36,658
Columns: 4
$ tnx_timestamp <dttm> 2009-12-01 07:45:00, 2009-12-01 07:45:59, 2009-12-01 09…
$ customer_id   <fct> 13085, 13085, 13078, 15362, 18102, 12682, 18087, 18087, …
$ invoice_id    <chr> "489434", "489435", "489436", "489437", "489438", "48943…
$ tnx_amount    <dbl> 505.30, 145.80, 630.33, 310.75, 2286.24, 372.30, 50.40, …

Code

customer_subset_id <- read_rds("data/onlineretail_customer_subset_ids.rds")
customer_subset_id |> glimpse()

 Factor w/ 5852 levels "13085","13078",..: 2 3 8 10 14 16 17 21 27 30 ...

1.2 Load Derived Data

Code

customer_summarystats_tbl <- read_rds("data/onlineretail_customer_summarystats_tbl.rds")

obs_fitdata_tbl   <- read_rds("data/onlineretail_obs_fitdata_tbl.rds")
obs_validdata_tbl <- read_rds("data/onlineretail_obs_validdata_tbl.rds")

customer_fit_stats_tbl <- obs_fitdata_tbl |>
  rename(x = tnx_count)

1.3 Load Subset Data

We also want to construct our data subsets for the purposes of speeding up our valuations.

Code

customer_fit_subset_tbl <- obs_fitdata_tbl |>
  filter(customer_id %in% customer_subset_id)

customer_fit_subset_tbl |> glimpse()

Rows: 1,000
Columns: 6
$ customer_id    <fct> 13078, 15362, 14110, 13758, 17592, 13767, 17238, 17700,…
$ first_tnx_date <dttm> 2009-12-01 09:05:59, 2009-12-01 09:08:00, 2009-12-01 0…
$ last_tnx_date  <dttm> 2010-11-30 13:17:59, 2010-09-17 10:36:59, 2010-09-30 1…
$ tnx_count      <dbl> 30, 1, 20, 6, 0, 35, 14, 9, 4, 9, 78, 2, 17, 5, 22, 2, …
$ t_x            <dbl> 52.02500, 41.43740, 43.32966, 51.72589, 0.00000, 52.034…
$ T_cal          <dbl> 52.08869, 52.08849, 52.08433, 52.08274, 52.07847, 52.07…

Code

customer_valid_subset_tbl <- obs_validdata_tbl |>
  filter(customer_id %in% customer_subset_id)

customer_valid_subset_tbl |> glimpse()

Rows: 1,000
Columns: 3
$ customer_id       <fct> 13078, 15362, 14110, 13758, 17592, 13767, 17238, 177…
$ tnx_count         <dbl> 26, 0, 12, 7, 0, 37, 17, 4, 4, 13, 48, 0, 13, 3, 16,…
$ tnx_last_interval <dbl> 52.950000, NA, 52.931151, 51.780853, NA, 53.089286, …

We now use these datasets to set the start and end dates for our various validation methods.

Code

dates_lst <- read_rds("data/onlineretail_simulation_dates.rds")

use_fit_start_date <- dates_lst$use_fit_start_date
use_fit_end_date   <- dates_lst$use_fit_end_date

use_valid_start_date <- dates_lst$use_valid_start_date
use_valid_end_date   <- dates_lst$use_valid_end_date

Finally, we need to set our directories where we save our Stan code and the model outputs.

Code

stan_modeldir <- "stan_models"
stan_codedir  <-   "stan_code"

2 Fit First P/NBD Model

We now construct our Stan model and prepare to fit it with our synthetic dataset.

We also want to set a number of overall parameters for this workbook

To start the fit data, we want to use the 1,000 customers. We also need to calculate the summary statistics for the validation period.

2.1 Compile and Fit Stan Model

We now compile this model using CmdStanR.

Code

pnbd_fixed_stanmodel <- cmdstan_model(
  "stan_code/pnbd_fixed.stan",
  include_paths =   stan_codedir,
  pedantic      =           TRUE,
  dir           =  stan_modeldir
  )

We then use this compiled model with our data to produce a fit of the data.

Code

stan_modelname <- "pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1"
stanfit_seed   <- stanfit_seed + 1
stanfit_prefix <- str_c("fit_", stan_modelname) 

stanfit_object_file <- glue("data/{stanfit_prefix}_stanfit.rds")

stan_data_lst <- customer_fit_stats_tbl |>
  select(customer_id, x, t_x, T_cal) |>
  compose_data(
    lambda_mn = 0.25,
    lambda_cv = 1.00,
    
    mu_mn     = 0.10,
    mu_cv     = 1.00,
    )

if(!file_exists(stanfit_object_file)) {
  pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_stanfit <- pnbd_fixed_stanmodel$sample(
    data            =                stan_data_lst,
    chains          =                            4,
    iter_warmup     =                          500,
    iter_sampling   =                          500,
    seed            =                 stanfit_seed,
    save_warmup     =                         TRUE,
    output_dir      =                stan_modeldir,
    output_basename =               stanfit_prefix,
    )
  
  pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_stanfit$save_object(stanfit_object_file, compress = "gzip")

} else {
  pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_stanfit <- read_rds(stanfit_object_file)
}

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_stanfit$summary()

# A tibble: 12,718 × 10
   variable       mean   median      sd     mad       q5      q95  rhat ess_bulk
   <chr>         <num>    <num>   <num>   <num>    <num>    <num> <num>    <num>
 1 lp__       -6.82e+4 -6.82e+4 69.8    71.1    -6.83e+4 -6.81e+4 1.00      697.
 2 lambda[1]   4.13e-1  3.88e-1  0.181   0.172   1.64e-1  7.57e-1 1.00     1440.
 3 lambda[2]   5.56e-1  5.51e-1  0.0966  0.0965  4.07e-1  7.27e-1 1.00     2157.
 4 lambda[3]   3.60e-2  3.07e-2  0.0256  0.0216  5.99e-3  8.53e-2 1.00     1905.
 5 lambda[4]   1.53e+0  1.52e+0  0.171   0.168   1.26e+0  1.83e+0 1.00     1926.
 6 lambda[5]   3.59e-1  3.54e-1  0.0807  0.0794  2.38e-1  5.00e-1 0.999    2092.
 7 lambda[6]   2.68e-1  2.63e-1  0.0697  0.0697  1.64e-1  3.89e-1 1.00     2114.
 8 lambda[7]   5.59e-2  5.00e-2  0.0324  0.0283  1.51e-2  1.18e-1 0.999    2823.
 9 lambda[8]   4.06e-1  3.99e-1  0.0878  0.0871  2.76e-1  5.64e-1 1.01     2300.
10 lambda[9]   1.69e-1  1.62e-1  0.0564  0.0543  9.12e-2  2.73e-1 0.999    2051.
# ℹ 12,708 more rows
# ℹ 1 more variable: ess_tail <num>

We have some basic HMC-based validity statistics we can check.

Code

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_stanfit$cmdstan_diagnose()

Processing csv files: /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1-1.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data
, /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1-2.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data
, /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1-3.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data
, /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1-4.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data


Checking sampler transitions treedepth.
Treedepth satisfactory for all transitions.

Checking sampler transitions for divergences.
No divergent transitions found.

Checking E-BFMI - sampler transitions HMC potential energy.
E-BFMI satisfactory.

Effective sample size satisfactory.

Split R-hat values satisfactory all parameters.

Processing complete, no problems detected.

2.2 Visual Diagnostics of the Sample Validity

Now that we have a sample from the posterior distribution we need to create a few different visualisations of the diagnostics.

Code

parameter_subset <- c(
  "lambda[1]", "lambda[2]", "lambda[3]", "lambda[4]",
  "mu[1]",     "mu[2]",     "mu[3]",     "mu[4]"
  )

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_stanfit$draws(inc_warmup = FALSE) |>
  mcmc_trace(pars = parameter_subset) +
  expand_limits(y = 0) +
  labs(
    x = "Iteration",
    y = "Value",
    title = "Traceplot of Sample of Lambda and Mu Values"
    ) +
  theme(axis.text.x = element_text(size = 10))

We also check \(N_{eff}\) as a quick diagnostic of the fit.

Code

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_stanfit |>
  neff_ratio(pars = c("lambda", "mu")) |>
  mcmc_neff() +
    ggtitle("Plot of Parameter Effective Sample Sizes")

2.3 Assess the Model

As we intend to run the same logic to assess each of our models, we have combined all this logic into a single function run_model_assessment, to run the simulations and combine the datasets.

Code

pnbd_stanfit <- pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_stanfit |>
  recover_types(customer_fit_stats_tbl)

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_assess_data_lst <- run_model_assessment(
  model_stanfit    = pnbd_stanfit,
  insample_tbl     = customer_fit_subset_tbl,
  fit_label        = "pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1",
  fit_end_dttm     = use_fit_end_date     |> as.POSIXct(),
  valid_start_dttm = use_valid_start_date |> as.POSIXct(),
  valid_end_dttm   = use_valid_end_date   |> as.POSIXct(),
  sim_seed         = 10
  )

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_assess_data_lst |> glimpse()

List of 5
 $ model_fit_index_filepath     : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_assess_fit_index_tbl.rds"
 $ model_valid_index_filepath   : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_assess_valid_index_tbl.rds"
 $ model_simstats_filepath      : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_assess_model_simstats_tbl.rds"
 $ model_fit_simstats_filepath  : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_assess_fit_simstats_tbl.rds"
 $ model_valid_simstats_filepath: 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_assess_valid_simstats_tbl.rds"

2.3.1 Check In-Sample Data Validation

We first check the model against the in-sample data.

Code

simdata_tbl <- pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_assess_data_lst |>
  use_series(model_fit_simstats_filepath) |>
  read_rds()

insample_plots_lst <- create_model_assessment_plots(
  obsdata_tbl = customer_fit_subset_tbl,
  simdata_tbl = simdata_tbl
  )

insample_plots_lst$multi_plot |> print()

Code

insample_plots_lst$total_plot |> print()

Code

insample_plots_lst$quant_plot |> print()

This fit looks reasonable and appears to capture most of the aspects of the data used to fit it. Given that this is a synthetic dataset, this is not surprising, but at least we appreciate that our model is valid.

2.3.2 Check Out-of-Sample Data Validation

We now repeat for the out-of-sample data.

Code

simdata_tbl <- pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_assess_data_lst |>
  use_series(model_valid_simstats_filepath) |>
  read_rds()

outsample_plots_lst <- create_model_assessment_plots(
  obsdata_tbl = customer_valid_subset_tbl,
  simdata_tbl = simdata_tbl
  )

outsample_plots_lst$multi_plot |> print()

Code

outsample_plots_lst$total_plot |> print()

Code

outsample_plots_lst$quant_plot |> print()

As for our short time frame data, overall our model is working well.

           used  (Mb) gc trigger   (Mb)  max used   (Mb)
Ncells  3734784 199.5    6345190  338.9   6345190  338.9
Vcells 62834366 479.4  145979253 1113.8 145979225 1113.8

3 Fit Alternate Prior Model.

We want to try an alternate prior model with a smaller co-efficient of variation to see what impact it has on our procedures.

Code

stan_modelname <- "pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2"
stanfit_seed   <- stanfit_seed + 1
stanfit_prefix <- str_c("fit_", stan_modelname) 

stanfit_object_file <- glue("data/{stanfit_prefix}_stanfit.rds")

stan_data_lst <- customer_fit_stats_tbl |>
  select(customer_id, x, t_x, T_cal) |>
  compose_data(
    lambda_mn = 0.25,
    lambda_cv = 0.50,
    
    mu_mn     = 0.10,
    mu_cv     = 0.50,
    )

if(!file_exists(stanfit_object_file)) {
  pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_stanfit <- pnbd_fixed_stanmodel$sample(
    data            =                stan_data_lst,
    chains          =                            4,
    iter_warmup     =                          500,
    iter_sampling   =                          500,
    seed            =                 stanfit_seed,
    save_warmup     =                         TRUE,
    output_dir      =                stan_modeldir,
    output_basename =               stanfit_prefix,
    )
  
  pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_stanfit$save_object(stanfit_object_file, compress = "gzip")

} else {
  pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_stanfit <- read_rds(stanfit_object_file)
}

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_stanfit$summary()

# A tibble: 12,718 × 10
   variable       mean   median      sd     mad       q5      q95  rhat ess_bulk
   <chr>         <num>    <num>   <num>   <num>    <num>    <num> <num>    <num>
 1 lp__       -1.44e+5 -1.44e+5 69.2    68.2    -1.44e+5 -1.44e+5  1.01     613.
 2 lambda[1]   3.39e-1  3.27e-1  0.116   0.114   1.73e-1  5.46e-1  1.01    3911.
 3 lambda[2]   5.00e-1  4.94e-1  0.0882  0.0878  3.61e-1  6.54e-1  1.00    5498.
 4 lambda[3]   7.76e-2  7.10e-2  0.0362  0.0330  2.99e-2  1.45e-1  1.00    4314.
 5 lambda[4]   1.30e+0  1.30e+0  0.141   0.140   1.07e+0  1.54e+0  1.00    5548.
 6 lambda[5]   3.39e-1  3.34e-1  0.0708  0.0688  2.29e-1  4.62e-1  1.00    5049.
 7 lambda[6]   2.63e-1  2.57e-1  0.0622  0.0604  1.68e-1  3.70e-1  1.00    3365.
 8 lambda[7]   9.32e-2  8.75e-2  0.0404  0.0393  3.81e-2  1.66e-1  1.00    4361.
 9 lambda[8]   3.84e-1  3.77e-1  0.0765  0.0736  2.66e-1  5.24e-1  1.01    4124.
10 lambda[9]   1.90e-1  1.85e-1  0.0570  0.0576  1.07e-1  2.91e-1  1.00    4275.
# ℹ 12,708 more rows
# ℹ 1 more variable: ess_tail <num>

We have some basic HMC-based validity statistics we can check.

Code

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_stanfit$cmdstan_diagnose()

Processing csv files: /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2-1.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data
, /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2-2.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data
, /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2-3.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data
, /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2-4.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data


Checking sampler transitions treedepth.
Treedepth satisfactory for all transitions.

Checking sampler transitions for divergences.
No divergent transitions found.

Checking E-BFMI - sampler transitions HMC potential energy.
E-BFMI satisfactory.

Effective sample size satisfactory.

Split R-hat values satisfactory all parameters.

Processing complete, no problems detected.

3.1 Visual Diagnostics of the Sample Validity

Now that we have a sample from the posterior distribution we need to create a few different visualisations of the diagnostics.

Code

parameter_subset <- c(
  "lambda[1]", "lambda[2]", "lambda[3]", "lambda[4]",
  "mu[1]",     "mu[2]",     "mu[3]",     "mu[4]"
  )

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_stanfit$draws(inc_warmup = FALSE) |>
  mcmc_trace(pars = parameter_subset) +
  expand_limits(y = 0) +
  labs(
    x = "Iteration",
    y = "Value",
    title = "Traceplot of Sample of Lambda and Mu Values"
    ) +
  theme(axis.text.x = element_text(size = 10))

We want to check the \(N_{eff}\) statistics also.

Code

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_stanfit |>
  neff_ratio(pars = c("lambda", "mu")) |>
  mcmc_neff() +
    ggtitle("Plot of Parameter Effective Sample Sizes")

3.2 Assess the Model

As we intend to run the same logic to assess each of our models, we have combined all this logic into a single function run_model_assessment, to run the simulations and combine the datasets.

Code

pnbd_stanfit <- pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_stanfit |>
  recover_types(customer_fit_stats_tbl)

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_assess_data_lst <- run_model_assessment(
  model_stanfit    = pnbd_stanfit,
  insample_tbl     = customer_fit_subset_tbl,
  fit_label        = "pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2",
  fit_end_dttm     = use_fit_end_date     |> as.POSIXct(),
  valid_start_dttm = use_valid_start_date |> as.POSIXct(),
  valid_end_dttm   = use_valid_end_date   |> as.POSIXct(),
  sim_seed         = 20
  )

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_assess_data_lst |> glimpse()

List of 5
 $ model_fit_index_filepath     : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_assess_fit_index_tbl.rds"
 $ model_valid_index_filepath   : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_assess_valid_index_tbl.rds"
 $ model_simstats_filepath      : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_assess_model_simstats_tbl.rds"
 $ model_fit_simstats_filepath  : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_assess_fit_simstats_tbl.rds"
 $ model_valid_simstats_filepath: 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_assess_valid_simstats_tbl.rds"

3.2.1 Check In-Sample Data Validation

We first check the model against the in-sample data.

Code

simdata_tbl <- pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_assess_data_lst |>
  use_series(model_fit_simstats_filepath) |>
  read_rds()

insample_plots_lst <- create_model_assessment_plots(
  obsdata_tbl = customer_fit_subset_tbl,
  simdata_tbl = simdata_tbl
  )

insample_plots_lst$multi_plot |> print()

Code

insample_plots_lst$total_plot |> print()

Code

insample_plots_lst$quant_plot |> print()

This fit looks reasonable and appears to capture most of the aspects of the data used to fit it. Given that this is a synthetic dataset, this is not surprising, but at least we appreciate that our model is valid.

3.2.2 Check Out-of-Sample Data Validation

We now repeat for the out-of-sample data.

Code

simdata_tbl <- pnbd_onlineretail_fixed2_assess_data_lst |>
  use_series(model_valid_simstats_filepath) |>
  read_rds()

outsample_plots_lst <- create_model_assessment_plots(
  obsdata_tbl = customer_valid_subset_tbl,
  simdata_tbl = simdata_tbl
  )

outsample_plots_lst$multi_plot |> print()

Code

outsample_plots_lst$total_plot |> print()

Code

outsample_plots_lst$quant_plot |> print()

            used  (Mb) gc trigger   (Mb)  max used   (Mb)
Ncells   3769015 201.3    6345190  338.9   6345190  338.9
Vcells 113832929 868.5  252543347 1926.8 210386018 1605.2

4 Fit Tight-Lifetime Model

We now want to try a model where we use priors with a tighter coefficient of variation for lifetime but keep the CoV for transaction frequency.

Code

stan_modelname <- "pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3"
stanfit_seed   <- stanfit_seed + 1
stanfit_prefix <- str_c("fit_", stan_modelname) 

stanfit_object_file <- glue("data/{stanfit_prefix}_stanfit.rds")


stan_data_lst <- customer_fit_stats_tbl |>
  select(customer_id, x, t_x, T_cal) |>
  compose_data(
    lambda_mn = 0.25,
    lambda_cv = 1.00,
    
    mu_mn     = 0.10,
    mu_cv     = 0.50,
    )

if(!file_exists(stanfit_object_file)) {
  pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_stanfit <- pnbd_fixed_stanmodel$sample(
    data            =                stan_data_lst,
    chains          =                            4,
    iter_warmup     =                          500,
    iter_sampling   =                          500,
    seed            =                 stanfit_seed,
    save_warmup     =                         TRUE,
    output_dir      =                stan_modeldir,
    output_basename =               stanfit_prefix,
    )
  
  pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_stanfit$save_object(stanfit_object_file, compress = "gzip")

} else {
  pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_stanfit <- read_rds(stanfit_object_file)
}

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_stanfit$summary()

# A tibble: 12,718 × 10
   variable       mean   median      sd     mad       q5      q95  rhat ess_bulk
   <chr>         <num>    <num>   <num>   <num>    <num>    <num> <num>    <num>
 1 lp__       -1.12e+5 -1.12e+5 68.9    69.7    -1.12e+5 -1.12e+5  1.01     605.
 2 lambda[1]   4.15e-1  3.87e-1  0.177   0.168   1.70e-1  7.37e-1  1.00    2596.
 3 lambda[2]   5.55e-1  5.48e-1  0.104   0.102   4.01e-1  7.34e-1  1.00    2939.
 4 lambda[3]   3.74e-2  3.12e-2  0.0277  0.0240  5.88e-3  9.37e-2  1.00    1848.
 5 lambda[4]   1.54e+0  1.53e+0  0.166   0.171   1.28e+0  1.82e+0  1.00    2530.
 6 lambda[5]   3.55e-1  3.52e-1  0.0780  0.0772  2.39e-1  4.91e-1  1.00    2398.
 7 lambda[6]   2.66e-1  2.60e-1  0.0679  0.0658  1.68e-1  3.88e-1  1.00    2663.
 8 lambda[7]   5.60e-2  4.97e-2  0.0331  0.0306  1.50e-2  1.18e-1  1.00    1925.
 9 lambda[8]   4.16e-1  4.11e-1  0.0955  0.0943  2.71e-1  5.86e-1  1.00    2484.
10 lambda[9]   1.74e-1  1.66e-1  0.0581  0.0550  8.90e-2  2.76e-1  1.00    3077.
# ℹ 12,708 more rows
# ℹ 1 more variable: ess_tail <num>

We have some basic HMC-based validity statistics we can check.

Code

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_stanfit$cmdstan_diagnose()

Processing csv files: /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3-1.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data
, /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3-2.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data
, /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3-3.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data
, /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3-4.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data


Checking sampler transitions treedepth.
Treedepth satisfactory for all transitions.

Checking sampler transitions for divergences.
No divergent transitions found.

Checking E-BFMI - sampler transitions HMC potential energy.
E-BFMI satisfactory.

Effective sample size satisfactory.

Split R-hat values satisfactory all parameters.

Processing complete, no problems detected.

4.1 Visual Diagnostics of the Sample Validity

Now that we have a sample from the posterior distribution we need to create a few different visualisations of the diagnostics.

Code

parameter_subset <- c(
  "lambda[1]", "lambda[2]", "lambda[3]", "lambda[4]",
  "mu[1]",     "mu[2]",     "mu[3]",     "mu[4]"
  )

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_stanfit$draws(inc_warmup = FALSE) |>
  mcmc_trace(pars = parameter_subset) +
  expand_limits(y = 0) +
  labs(
    x = "Iteration",
    y = "Value",
    title = "Traceplot of Sample of Lambda and Mu Values"
    ) +
  theme(axis.text.x = element_text(size = 10))

We want to check the \(N_{eff}\) statistics also.

Code

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_stanfit |>
  neff_ratio(pars = c("lambda", "mu")) |>
  mcmc_neff() +
    ggtitle("Plot of Parameter Effective Sample Sizes")

4.2 Assess the Model

As we intend to run the same logic to assess each of our models, we have combined all this logic into a single function run_model_assessment, to run the simulations and combine the datasets.

Code

pnbd_stanfit <- pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_stanfit |>
  recover_types(customer_fit_stats_tbl)

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_assess_data_lst <- run_model_assessment(
  model_stanfit    = pnbd_stanfit,
  insample_tbl     = customer_fit_subset_tbl,
  fit_label        = "pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3",
  fit_end_dttm     = use_fit_end_date     |> as.POSIXct(),
  valid_start_dttm = use_valid_start_date |> as.POSIXct(),
  valid_end_dttm   = use_valid_end_date   |> as.POSIXct(),
  sim_seed         = 30
  )

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_assess_data_lst |> glimpse()

List of 5
 $ model_fit_index_filepath     : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_assess_fit_index_tbl.rds"
 $ model_valid_index_filepath   : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_assess_valid_index_tbl.rds"
 $ model_simstats_filepath      : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_assess_model_simstats_tbl.rds"
 $ model_fit_simstats_filepath  : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_assess_fit_simstats_tbl.rds"
 $ model_valid_simstats_filepath: 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_assess_valid_simstats_tbl.rds"

4.2.1 Check In-Sample Data Validation

We first check the model against the in-sample data.

Code

simdata_tbl <- pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_assess_data_lst |>
  use_series(model_fit_simstats_filepath) |>
  read_rds()

insample_plots_lst <- create_model_assessment_plots(
  obsdata_tbl = customer_fit_subset_tbl,
  simdata_tbl = simdata_tbl
  )

insample_plots_lst$multi_plot |> print()

Code

insample_plots_lst$total_plot |> print()

Code

insample_plots_lst$quant_plot |> print()

This fit looks reasonable and appears to capture most of the aspects of the data used to fit it. Given that this is a synthetic dataset, this is not surprising, but at least we appreciate that our model is valid.

4.2.2 Check Out-of-Sample Data Validation

We now repeat for the out-of-sample data.

Code

simdata_tbl <- pnbd_onlineretail_fixed3_assess_data_lst |>
  use_series(model_valid_simstats_filepath) |>
  read_rds()

outsample_plots_lst <- create_model_assessment_plots(
  obsdata_tbl = customer_valid_subset_tbl,
  simdata_tbl = simdata_tbl
  )

outsample_plots_lst$multi_plot |> print()

Code

outsample_plots_lst$total_plot |> print()

Code

outsample_plots_lst$quant_plot |> print()

            used   (Mb) gc trigger   (Mb)  max used   (Mb)
Ncells   3802806  203.1    6345190  338.9   6345190  338.9
Vcells 164830386 1257.6  303132016 2312.8 284641639 2171.7

5 Fit Narrow-Short-Lifetime Model

We now want to try a model where we use priors with a tighter coefficient of variation for lifetime but keep the CoV for transaction frequency.

Code

stan_modelname <- "pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4"
stanfit_seed   <- stanfit_seed + 1
stanfit_prefix <- str_c("fit_", stan_modelname) 

stanfit_object_file <- glue("data/{stanfit_prefix}_stanfit.rds")


stan_data_lst <- customer_fit_stats_tbl |>
  select(customer_id, x, t_x, T_cal) |>
  compose_data(
    lambda_mn = 0.25,
    lambda_cv = 1.00,
    
    mu_mn     = 0.20,
    mu_cv     = 0.30,
    )

if(!file_exists(stanfit_object_file)) {
  pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_stanfit <- pnbd_fixed_stanmodel$sample(
    data            =                stan_data_lst,
    chains          =                            4,
    iter_warmup     =                          500,
    iter_sampling   =                          500,
    seed            =                 stanfit_seed,
    save_warmup     =                         TRUE,
    output_dir      =                stan_modeldir,
    output_basename =               stanfit_prefix,
    )
  
  pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_stanfit$save_object(stanfit_object_file, compress = "gzip")

} else {
  pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_stanfit <- read_rds(stanfit_object_file)
}

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_stanfit$summary()

# A tibble: 12,718 × 10
   variable       mean   median      sd     mad       q5      q95  rhat ess_bulk
   <chr>         <num>    <num>   <num>   <num>    <num>    <num> <num>    <num>
 1 lp__       -1.85e+5 -1.85e+5 72.6    71.2    -1.85e+5 -1.85e+5  1.00     614.
 2 lambda[1]   4.33e-1  4.07e-1  0.185   0.182   1.81e-1  7.71e-1  1.00    4446.
 3 lambda[2]   5.54e-1  5.48e-1  0.0960  0.0927  4.03e-1  7.26e-1  1.00    3055.
 4 lambda[3]   3.96e-2  3.40e-2  0.0275  0.0236  7.05e-3  9.42e-2  1.00    3003.
 5 lambda[4]   1.55e+0  1.54e+0  0.167   0.170   1.29e+0  1.84e+0  1.01    3460.
 6 lambda[5]   3.56e-1  3.50e-1  0.0764  0.0712  2.37e-1  4.94e-1  1.00    3450.
 7 lambda[6]   2.65e-1  2.60e-1  0.0677  0.0674  1.66e-1  3.86e-1  1.00    2932.
 8 lambda[7]   5.81e-2  5.29e-2  0.0327  0.0301  1.60e-2  1.20e-1  1.00    2270.
 9 lambda[8]   4.25e-1  4.16e-1  0.0957  0.0948  2.79e-1  5.95e-1  1.00    4148.
10 lambda[9]   1.79e-1  1.72e-1  0.0573  0.0545  9.72e-2  2.88e-1  1.00    3465.
# ℹ 12,708 more rows
# ℹ 1 more variable: ess_tail <num>

We have some basic HMC-based validity statistics we can check.

Code

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_stanfit$cmdstan_diagnose()

Processing csv files: /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4-1.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data
, /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4-2.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data
, /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4-3.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data
, /home/rstudio/btydwork/stan_models/fit_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4-4.csvWarning: non-fatal error reading adaptation data


Checking sampler transitions treedepth.
Treedepth satisfactory for all transitions.

Checking sampler transitions for divergences.
No divergent transitions found.

Checking E-BFMI - sampler transitions HMC potential energy.
E-BFMI satisfactory.

Effective sample size satisfactory.

Split R-hat values satisfactory all parameters.

Processing complete, no problems detected.

5.1 Visual Diagnostics of the Sample Validity

Now that we have a sample from the posterior distribution we need to create a few different visualisations of the diagnostics.

Code

parameter_subset <- c(
  "lambda[1]", "lambda[2]", "lambda[3]", "lambda[4]",
  "mu[1]",     "mu[2]",     "mu[3]",     "mu[4]"
  )

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_stanfit$draws(inc_warmup = FALSE) |>
  mcmc_trace(pars = parameter_subset) +
  expand_limits(y = 0) +
  labs(
    x = "Iteration",
    y = "Value",
    title = "Traceplot of Sample of Lambda and Mu Values"
    ) +
  theme(axis.text.x = element_text(size = 10))

We want to check the \(N_{eff}\) statistics also.

Code

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_stanfit |>
  neff_ratio(pars = c("lambda", "mu")) |>
  mcmc_neff() +
    ggtitle("Plot of Parameter Effective Sample Sizes")

5.2 Assess the Model

As we intend to run the same logic to assess each of our models, we have combined all this logic into a single function run_model_assessment, to run the simulations and combine the datasets.

Code

pnbd_stanfit <- pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_stanfit |>
  recover_types(customer_fit_stats_tbl)

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_assess_data_lst <- run_model_assessment(
  model_stanfit    = pnbd_stanfit,
  insample_tbl     = customer_fit_subset_tbl,
  fit_label        = "pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4",
  fit_end_dttm     = use_fit_end_date     |> as.POSIXct(),
  valid_start_dttm = use_valid_start_date |> as.POSIXct(),
  valid_end_dttm   = use_valid_end_date   |> as.POSIXct(),
  sim_seed         = 40
  )

pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_assess_data_lst |> glimpse()

List of 5
 $ model_fit_index_filepath     : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_assess_fit_index_tbl.rds"
 $ model_valid_index_filepath   : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_assess_valid_index_tbl.rds"
 $ model_simstats_filepath      : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_assess_model_simstats_tbl.rds"
 $ model_fit_simstats_filepath  : 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_assess_fit_simstats_tbl.rds"
 $ model_valid_simstats_filepath: 'glue' chr "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_assess_valid_simstats_tbl.rds"

5.2.1 Check In-Sample Data Validation

We first check the model against the in-sample data.

Code

simdata_tbl <- pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_assess_data_lst |>
  use_series(model_fit_simstats_filepath) |>
  read_rds()

insample_plots_lst <- create_model_assessment_plots(
  obsdata_tbl = customer_fit_subset_tbl,
  simdata_tbl = simdata_tbl
  )

insample_plots_lst$multi_plot |> print()

Code

insample_plots_lst$total_plot |> print()

Code

insample_plots_lst$quant_plot |> print()

This fit looks reasonable and appears to capture most of the aspects of the data used to fit it. Given that this is a synthetic dataset, this is not surprising, but at least we appreciate that our model is valid.

5.2.2 Check Out-of-Sample Data Validation

We now repeat for the out-of-sample data.

Code

simdata_tbl <- pnbd_onlineretail_fixed4_assess_data_lst |>
  use_series(model_valid_simstats_filepath) |>
  read_rds()

outsample_plots_lst <- create_model_assessment_plots(
  obsdata_tbl = customer_valid_subset_tbl,
  simdata_tbl = simdata_tbl
  )

outsample_plots_lst$multi_plot |> print()

Code

outsample_plots_lst$total_plot |> print()

Code

outsample_plots_lst$quant_plot |> print()

            used   (Mb) gc trigger   (Mb)  max used   (Mb)
Ncells   3836618  204.9    6345190  338.9   6345190  338.9
Vcells 215827862 1646.7  363838419 2775.9 335328366 2558.4

6 Compare Model Outputs

We have looked at each of the models individually, but it is also worth looking at each of the models as a group.

Code

calculate_simulation_statistics <- function(file_rds) {
  simdata_tbl <- read_rds(file_rds)
  
  multicount_cust_tbl <- simdata_tbl |>
    filter(sim_tnx_count > 0) |>
    count(draw_id, name = "multicust_count")
  
  totaltnx_data_tbl <- simdata_tbl |>
    count(draw_id, wt = sim_tnx_count, name = "simtnx_count")
  
  simstats_tbl <- multicount_cust_tbl |>
    inner_join(totaltnx_data_tbl, by = "draw_id")
  
  return(simstats_tbl)
}

Code

obs_fit_customer_count <- obs_fitdata_tbl |>
  filter(tnx_count > 0) |>
  nrow()

obs_valid_customer_count <- obs_validdata_tbl |>
  filter(tnx_count > 0) |>
  nrow()

obs_fit_total_count <- obs_fitdata_tbl |>
  pull(tnx_count) |>
  sum()

obs_valid_total_count <- obs_validdata_tbl |>
  pull(tnx_count) |>
  sum()

obs_stats_tbl <- tribble(
  ~assess_type, ~name,               ~obs_value,
  "fit",        "multicust_count",   obs_fit_customer_count,
  "fit",        "simtnx_count",      obs_fit_total_count,
  "valid",      "multicust_count",   obs_valid_customer_count,
  "valid",      "simtnx_count",      obs_valid_total_count
  )

model_assess_tbl <- dir_ls("data", regexp = "pnbd_onlineretail_fixed.*_assess_.*simstats") |>
  enframe(name = NULL, value = "file_path") |>
  filter(str_detect(file_path, "_assess_model_", negate = TRUE)) |>
  mutate(
    model_label = str_replace(file_path, "data/pnbd_onlineretail_(.*?)_assess_.*", "\\1"),
    assess_type = if_else(str_detect(file_path, "_assess_fit_"), "fit", "valid"),
    
    sim_data = map(
      file_path, calculate_simulation_statistics,
      
      .progress = "calculate_simulation_statistics"
      )
    )

model_assess_tbl |> glimpse()

Rows: 8
Columns: 4
$ file_path   <fs::path> "data/pnbd_onlineretail_fixed1_assess_fit_simstats_tb…
$ model_label <chr> "fixed1", "fixed1", "fixed2", "fixed2", "fixed3", "fixed3"…
$ assess_type <chr> "fit", "valid", "fit", "valid", "fit", "valid", "fit", "va…
$ sim_data    <list> [<tbl_df[2000 x 3]>], [<tbl_df[2000 x 3]>], [<tbl_df[2000…

We have now constructed the simulation summary statistics and now reshape our data to aid in our model assessment.

Code

model_assess_summstat_tbl <- model_assess_tbl |>
  select(model_label, assess_type, sim_data) |>
  unnest(sim_data) |>
  pivot_longer(
    cols = !c(model_label, assess_type, draw_id)
    ) |>
  group_by(model_label, assess_type, name) |>
  summarise(
    .groups = "drop",
    
    mean_val = mean(value),
    p10 = quantile(value, 0.10),
    p25 = quantile(value, 0.25),
    p50 = quantile(value, 0.50),
    p75 = quantile(value, 0.75),
    p90 = quantile(value, 0.90)
    )

model_assess_summstat_tbl |> glimpse()

Rows: 16
Columns: 9
$ model_label <chr> "fixed1", "fixed1", "fixed1", "fixed1", "fixed2", "fixed2"…
$ assess_type <chr> "fit", "fit", "valid", "valid", "fit", "fit", "valid", "va…
$ name        <chr> "multicust_count", "simtnx_count", "multicust_count", "sim…
$ mean_val    <dbl> 622.3905, 2851.7060, 464.1325, 4560.3920, 652.0735, 2388.2…
$ p10         <dbl> 604.0, 2717.0, 448.0, 4259.0, 633.0, 2263.0, 336.0, 1815.9…
$ p25         <dbl> 613.00, 2777.00, 456.00, 4391.00, 642.00, 2320.00, 343.00,…
$ p50         <dbl> 623, 2848, 464, 4545, 652, 2388, 351, 1984, 554, 2020, 326…
$ p75         <dbl> 632.00, 2920.00, 473.00, 4723.25, 662.00, 2458.00, 359.00,…
$ p90         <dbl> 640.0, 2997.1, 480.0, 4896.0, 671.0, 2516.0, 367.0, 2162.0…

We now use this data to construct model comparison plots for the different models we have fit.

Code

#! echo: TRUE

ggplot(model_assess_summstat_tbl) +
  geom_errorbar(
    aes(x = model_label, ymin = p10, ymax = p90), width = 0
    ) +
  geom_errorbar(
    aes(x = model_label, ymin = p25, ymax = p75), width = 0, linewidth = 3
    ) +
  geom_hline(
    aes(yintercept = obs_value),
    data = obs_stats_tbl, colour = "red"
    ) +
  scale_y_continuous(labels = label_comma()) +
  expand_limits(y = 0) +
  facet_wrap(
    vars(assess_type, name), scale = "free_y"
    ) +
  labs(
    x = "Model",
    y = "Count",
    title = "Comparison Plot for the Different Models"
    ) +
  theme(
    axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 20, vjust = 0.5, size = 8)
    )

6.1 Write Assessment Data to Disk

We now want to save the assessment data to disk.

Code

model_assess_tbl |> write_rds("data/assess_data_pnbd_onlineretail_fixed_tbl.rds")

R Environment

Code

options(width = 120L)
sessioninfo::session_info()

─ Session info ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 setting  value
 version  R version 4.3.1 (2023-06-16)
 os       Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
 system   x86_64, linux-gnu
 ui       X11
 language (EN)
 collate  en_US.UTF-8
 ctype    en_US.UTF-8
 tz       Europe/Dublin
 date     2023-11-11
 pandoc   3.1.1 @ /usr/local/bin/ (via rmarkdown)

─ Packages ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 package        * version    date (UTC) lib source
 abind            1.4-5      2016-07-21 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 arrayhelpers     1.1-0      2020-02-04 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 backports        1.4.1      2021-12-13 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 base64enc        0.1-3      2015-07-28 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 bayesplot      * 1.10.0     2022-11-16 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 bit              4.0.5      2022-11-15 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 bit64            4.0.5      2020-08-30 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 bridgesampling   1.1-2      2021-04-16 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 brms           * 2.20.4     2023-09-25 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 Brobdingnag      1.2-9      2022-10-19 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 cachem           1.0.8      2023-05-01 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 callr            3.7.3      2022-11-02 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 checkmate        2.3.0      2023-10-25 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 cli              3.6.1      2023-03-23 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 cmdstanr       * 0.6.0.9000 2023-11-07 [1] Github (stan-dev/cmdstanr@a13c798)
 coda             0.19-4     2020-09-30 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 codetools        0.2-19     2023-02-01 [2] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
 colorspace       2.1-0      2023-01-23 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 colourpicker     1.3.0      2023-08-21 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 conflicted     * 1.2.0      2023-02-01 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 cowplot        * 1.1.1      2020-12-30 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 crayon           1.5.2      2022-09-29 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 crosstalk        1.2.0      2021-11-04 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 curl             5.1.0      2023-10-02 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 digest           0.6.33     2023-07-07 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 directlabels   * 2023.8.25  2023-09-01 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 distributional   0.3.2      2023-03-22 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 dplyr          * 1.1.3      2023-09-03 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 DT               0.30       2023-10-05 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 dygraphs         1.1.1.6    2018-07-11 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 ellipsis         0.3.2      2021-04-29 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 evaluate         0.22       2023-09-29 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 fansi            1.0.5      2023-10-08 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 farver           2.1.1      2022-07-06 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 fastmap          1.1.1      2023-02-24 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 forcats        * 1.0.0      2023-01-29 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 fs             * 1.6.3      2023-07-20 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 furrr          * 0.3.1      2022-08-15 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 future         * 1.33.0     2023-07-01 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 generics         0.1.3      2022-07-05 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 ggdist           3.3.0      2023-05-13 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 ggplot2        * 3.4.4      2023-10-12 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 globals          0.16.2     2022-11-21 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 glue           * 1.6.2      2022-02-24 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 gridExtra        2.3        2017-09-09 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 gtable           0.3.4      2023-08-21 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 gtools           3.9.4      2022-11-27 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 hms              1.1.3      2023-03-21 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 htmltools        0.5.6.1    2023-10-06 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 htmlwidgets      1.6.2      2023-03-17 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 httpuv           1.6.12     2023-10-23 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 igraph           1.5.1      2023-08-10 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 inline           0.3.19     2021-05-31 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 jsonlite         1.8.7      2023-06-29 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 knitr            1.44       2023-09-11 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 labeling         0.4.3      2023-08-29 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 later            1.3.1      2023-05-02 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 lattice          0.21-8     2023-04-05 [2] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
 lifecycle        1.0.3      2022-10-07 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 listenv          0.9.0      2022-12-16 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 lobstr         * 1.1.2      2022-06-22 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 loo              2.6.0      2023-03-31 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 lubridate      * 1.9.3      2023-09-27 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 magrittr       * 2.0.3      2022-03-30 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 markdown         1.11       2023-10-19 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 Matrix           1.5-4.1    2023-05-18 [2] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
 matrixStats      1.0.0      2023-06-02 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 memoise          2.0.1      2021-11-26 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 mime             0.12       2021-09-28 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 miniUI           0.1.1.1    2018-05-18 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 munsell          0.5.0      2018-06-12 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 mvtnorm          1.2-3      2023-08-25 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 nlme             3.1-162    2023-01-31 [2] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
 parallelly       1.36.0     2023-05-26 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 pillar           1.9.0      2023-03-22 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 pkgbuild         1.4.2      2023-06-26 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 pkgconfig        2.0.3      2019-09-22 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 plyr             1.8.9      2023-10-02 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 posterior      * 1.4.1      2023-03-14 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 prettyunits      1.2.0      2023-09-24 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 processx         3.8.2      2023-06-30 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 promises         1.2.1      2023-08-10 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 ps               1.7.5      2023-04-18 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 purrr          * 1.0.2      2023-08-10 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 quadprog         1.5-8      2019-11-20 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 QuickJSR         1.0.7      2023-10-15 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 R6               2.5.1      2021-08-19 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 Rcpp           * 1.0.11     2023-07-06 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 RcppParallel     5.1.7      2023-02-27 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 readr          * 2.1.4      2023-02-10 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 reshape2         1.4.4      2020-04-09 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 rlang          * 1.1.1      2023-04-28 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 rmarkdown        2.25       2023-09-18 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 rstan            2.32.3     2023-10-15 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 rstantools       2.3.1.1    2023-07-18 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 rstudioapi       0.15.0     2023-07-07 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 rsyslog        * 1.0.3      2023-05-08 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 scales         * 1.2.1      2022-08-20 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 sessioninfo      1.2.2      2021-12-06 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 shiny            1.7.5.1    2023-10-14 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 shinyjs          2.1.0      2021-12-23 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 shinystan        2.6.0      2022-03-03 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 shinythemes      1.2.0      2021-01-25 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 StanHeaders      2.26.28    2023-09-07 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 stringi          1.7.12     2023-01-11 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 stringr        * 1.5.0      2022-12-02 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 svUnit           1.0.6      2021-04-19 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 tensorA          0.36.2     2020-11-19 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 threejs          0.3.3      2020-01-21 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 tibble         * 3.2.1      2023-03-20 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 tidybayes      * 3.0.6      2023-08-12 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 tidyr          * 1.3.0      2023-01-24 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 tidyselect       1.2.0      2022-10-10 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 tidyverse      * 2.0.0      2023-02-22 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 timechange       0.2.0      2023-01-11 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 tzdb             0.4.0      2023-05-12 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 utf8             1.2.4      2023-10-22 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 V8               4.4.0      2023-10-09 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 vctrs            0.6.4      2023-10-12 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 vroom            1.6.4      2023-10-02 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 withr            2.5.1      2023-09-26 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 xfun             0.40       2023-08-09 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 xtable           1.8-4      2019-04-21 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 xts              0.13.1     2023-04-16 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 yaml             2.3.7      2023-01-23 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)
 zoo              1.8-12     2023-04-13 [1] RSPM (R 4.3.0)

 [1] /usr/local/lib/R/site-library
 [2] /usr/local/lib/R/library

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Code

options(width = 80L)